Independent scores. No brand can pay for a better one.
Cradle Score
Postpartum underwear

Motherhood Maternity Seamless Postpartum Shaper Panty

About $25Checked Oct 29, 20262 sources

Our take

An ultra-high-waist panty with light compression that sits above a C-section scar, in sizes up to 3X. Absorbent, but hand wash only.

ReusableLight compressionUp to 3X

Consider instead: Bodily All-In for softer, no-compression comfort.

Before you buy

Do you need it?Must-have You'll need high-waisted disposable or washable underwear for several weeks after birth, after a vaginal birth or a C-section.
Cheaper optionFrida Mom Disposable Postpartum Underwear: About $16 for 8 (about $2 a pair), scored 75 (Good).
Secondhand?Buy new. Buy new.

What parents and testers say

Recurring praise

  • Wide size range
  • Light support
  • C-section friendly

Recurring complaints

  • Hand wash only

Our summary of patterns across the reviews and threads linked below, not quotes.

Materials & safety check

1 of 1 checks clear.

FabricCotton, nylon and spandex

When to buy it

Registry

Add these to your own list: they're for you, not the baby

By 36 weeks

Pack recovery basics in your hospital bag

First weeks

Restock what you actually use

Other postpartum underwear we scored

See all postpartum underwear →

Own this? Tell us how it's going

Reports from parents who've used a product for months are the hardest thing to find. Yours goes only to our team and helps keep this score honest. It isn't published.

How do you feel about it?

Common questions

Is the Motherhood Maternity Seamless Postpartum Shaper Panty non-toxic?

There's no legal definition of "non-toxic" for baby products, so here's what we checked. Fabric: Cotton, nylon and spandex. It scores 78 out of 100 on materials and safety, and 80 overall.

Not sure what a label means? See baby product labels, explained.

Sources

  1. The Bump: 7 best postpartum underwear, tested by 12 new momsthebump.com
  2. CPSC recall database: "underwear" recalls since 2022saferproducts.gov
Spot an error or something out of date?